Unveiling the Shadows: The Role of the US in Supporting Imam Khomeini's Rise to Power
The Iranian Revolution of 1979 is often heralded as a monumental moment in modern Islamic history, with Imam Khomeini emerging as the leader of a movement that overthrew the Western-backed Shah. The revolution is widely portrayed as an indigenous uprising, rooted in grievances against imperialism and despotism. However, deeper analysis reveals a web of covert relationships and hidden agendas that suggest the United States may have played a role in facilitating Khomeini’s ascent to power. Based on my research, I propose that the US supported Khomeini as part of a calculated strategy to counter the Sunni Islamic movements threatening its interests in the Middle East.
The Geopolitical Chessboard: US Interests in the Middle East
In the decades leading up to 1979, the Middle East was a battleground of competing ideologies. The Arab world, particularly under figures like Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser, was experiencing a wave of pan-Arab nationalism and Sunni Islamic revivalism. These movements posed significant challenges to Western hegemony in the region, threatening to unify the Muslim world under a framework that resisted Western interference and Zionist expansion.
Against this backdrop, the US faced the challenge of containing Sunni Islamic uprisings. The strategic objective, I argue, was to divert the energies of Islamic activism by promoting a counter-narrative—one that appeared Islamic but was ideologically and politically aligned with Western interests. Enter Shia Islam, and specifically, Twelver Shiism as embodied by Khomeini’s vision.
Khomeini’s Rise: An Engineered Outcome?
While Khomeini’s fiery rhetoric against the US and Israel suggests an adversarial relationship, declassified documents and circumstantial evidence suggest otherwise. In the months leading up to the Shah’s fall, there were reports of secret communications between US officials and Khomeini’s representatives. For example, the BBC Persian Service aired Khomeini's speeches extensively, ensuring that his message reached Iranians far and wide—a curious move for Western media allegedly opposed to him.
Moreover, US policymakers may have calculated that supporting Khomeini’s rise could serve a dual purpose. On the one hand, it would undermine the Shah, whose increasingly erratic governance was becoming a liability. On the other, it would replace the Shah’s secular regime with a religious one that, while outwardly hostile to the West, could fragment the Islamic world by introducing sectarian divides.
The Shia Factor: A Divisive Force in the Islamic World
Historically, Twelver Shiism has been a minority sect within Islam, with theological and political positions that often clash with Sunni orthodoxy. By elevating Khomeini, the US could amplify these divisions, weakening the broader Islamic movement. Khomeini’s revolutionary ideology, rooted in Shia eschatology and the concept of velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the jurist), diverged significantly from the Sunni movements striving for a unified caliphate.
In this context, Khomeini’s so-called Islamic Revolution can be seen as a counterfeit revolution, one that served Western interests by redirecting Islamic fervor into a sectarian project. Instead of a united front against Zionism and imperialism, the Muslim world became embroiled in sectarian conflicts, with Iran often at the center of these tensions.
The Role of the Zionist-Controlled Media
The US media played a crucial role in shaping the narrative around the Iranian Revolution. In the late 1970s, the coverage of Khomeini often depicted him as a spiritual leader opposed to tyranny, with little focus on the sectarian nature of his ideology. This portrayal helped legitimize his movement in the eyes of Western audiences while obscuring its divisive implications for the Islamic world.
It is worth noting that media narratives often serve broader geopolitical agendas. By framing the Iranian Revolution as the definitive Islamic uprising, the US and its allies could shift attention away from Sunni movements and cast Iran as the representative of political Islam. This narrative not only misrepresented the diversity of Islamic thought but also deepened the fractures within the Muslim world.
Twelver Shiism: A Greater Threat than Zionism?
From a theological perspective, many Sunni scholars view Twelver Shiism as a deviation from mainstream Islam. The emphasis on the hidden Imam, the veneration of saints, and the concept of clerical rule are seen as innovations that conflict with the principles of Sunni orthodoxy.
Politically, Khomeini’s regime has often acted in ways that contradict the broader interests of the Islamic Nation (Ummah). For example, its alliances with non-Muslim powers, its role in exacerbating sectarian conflicts in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, and its focus on exporting its revolutionary ideology have alienated Sunni-majority countries.
In this light, one might argue that Twelver Shiism, as promoted by Khomeini, poses a greater danger to the Islamic world than Zionism. While Zionism is an external threat, Twelver Shiism operates within the Muslim world, undermining unity from within.
Conspiratorial Evidence: Connecting the Dots
Several pieces of evidence support the hypothesis that the US facilitated Khomeini’s rise:
Secret Meetings and Communications: Declassified documents reveal that US officials engaged with Khomeini’s representatives before the revolution, discussing the future of US-Iran relations.
Media Amplification: The disproportionate coverage of Khomeini’s speeches by Western outlets suggests a deliberate effort to elevate his profile.
The Shah’s Weakening Position: Despite being a close ally, the Shah received minimal support from the US in his final days, raising questions about whether his downfall was orchestrated.
Post-Revolution US-Iran Dynamics: While the hostage crisis and subsequent hostility between the two countries appear genuine, some analysts argue that these events were part of a broader strategy to legitimize Khomeini’s regime and solidify his anti-Western credentials.
Conclusion: A Counterfeit Revolution?
The Iranian Revolution of 1979 was a turning point in modern history, but its true nature remains obscured by layers of propaganda and geopolitical maneuvering. Based on my research, it is plausible that the US played a role in facilitating Khomeini’s rise as part of a strategy to counter Sunni Islamic movements and deepen sectarian divides in the Middle East.
By supporting a Shia revolution, the US could fragment the Muslim world, redirecting its energies away from anti-imperialist and anti-Zionist struggles. The consequences of this strategy are still felt today, as the Islamic world grapples with the divisions and conflicts exacerbated by Khomeini’s revolution.
The Twelver Shiism propagated by Khomeini poses not only a theological challenge but also a political one, undermining the unity and strength of the Ummah. For Muslims committed to the principles of Sunni orthodoxy, recognizing and addressing this threat is essential.
As more evidence comes to light, it becomes increasingly clear that the Iranian Revolution was not the triumph of Islamic resistance it is often portrayed to be, but rather a carefully managed event that served the interests of global powers.
Visitors can access:
