Correspondence in Malay between Al-Malizi and Saifulislam

Abu Hurairah Al-Malizi

Dr MAZA hanya luahkan pandangan-pandangannya berdasarkan akidah dan manhaj yang sahih Rasulullah dan para sahabat. Boleh jadi selari dengan UMNO dan bertentangan dengan PAS secara tidak sengaja. Namun, dia hanya luahkan kebenaran berdasarkan kedudukannya sebagai alim dari manhaj sahih (salaf) tersebut.

Saya lihat 'kanser' utama yang menimpa kebanyakan para Islamis ialah taksub kepada jemaah masing-masing; kanser 'hizbiah' ini jika dibenarkan berleluasa boleh mencemarkan niat ikhlas para Islamis, dan akhirnya mereka berjuang semata-mata hendak tegakkan jemaah masing-masing dan kedua baru untuk ummah.

Sebelum kita menjadi 'ummah-centric' atau 'jamaah-centric' elok kita bertanya dulu sama ada kita sendiri sudah menjadi 'tawhid-centric' atau belum; ini amat penting kerana Tauhid misi utama semua Anbiya, misi paling utama mereka sebelum lagi Khilafah Islamiah. Ia satu-satunya misi bagi kebanyakan anbiya, yang tidak ditugaskan Allah untuk menegakkan Kerajaan Islam. Bukan semua nabi disuruh menegakkan Daulah Islamiah!

Penegakan Daulah Islamiah hanya bertujuan memudahkan penegakan Tauhid di seluruh muka bumi. Ia hanya alat, dan bukan matlamat kita.

Lagi sekali penegakan Tauhid ini juga mesti dibuat selaras dengan pembersihan nas-nas Islam (hadis-hadis) daripada penyelewengan golongan-golongan sesat seperti Syiah. Imam Al-Albani memanggil proses ini ‘Tasfiyyah dan menganggapnya satu kemestian sebelum ibadat-ibadat lain termasuk jihad dan menegakkan Negara Islam itu sendiri!

Mereka yang kafirkan para sahabat juga berjihad dan berpolitik, dan sekarang berjaya mendirikan Republik Islam mereka sendiri di Iran. Mereka ada Negara Islam sendiri tetapi mengkafirkan Abu Bakar dan Umar!

Jadi setelah kita menjadi ‘Tawhid-centric elok kemudian kita kaji semula amalan-amalan agama kita sama ada benar-benar Sunnatik atau bercampur-baur dengan bidaah dan khurafat.

Setelah kukuh itu, kita mesti kaji juga manhaj para Sahabat dalam menegakkan Islam. Adakah mereka sibuk sebarkan kelemahan-kelemahan para pemimpin di mimbar atau sibuk mengembangkan Din hingga tiada lagi fitnah? Kelemahan para pemimpin boleh dibincangkan tapi jangan dijadikan obsesi seolah-olah itu aktiviti utama Islamis dalam menegakkan Tauhid.

Dr MAZA jika dikaji secara mendalam seorang yang alim, dan saya sedih orang tolak dia bulat-bulat tanpa kaji manhaj sebenar para sahabat itu sendiri.

Manhaj kita sudah bercampur-baur antara Salaf dengan Khawarij dan Syiah serta pendekatan Islam fasis dan modenis.

Saya sedang meneliti perkembangan Syiah dalam PAS dan ia sedang berkembang, orang-orang seperti Tehrani dan Sabu sudah cukup sebagai bukti. Ini satu perkembangan yang amat merisaukan!

Dajjal nanti akan muncul di kalangan Syiah, dan dengan berkembangnya Syiah dalam PAS, satu perkara yang perlu kita fikirkan.

Oleh itu larilah kepada akidah dan manhaj para salaf sebelum menegakkan aspek-aspek lain dalam Islam. Ini yang dilakukan Syeikhul Islam Ibnu Taimiah dan ini yang patut saya rasa kita para Islamis, Sunni dan bukan Sunni buat!

Saifulislam

1. Terima kasih atas komen saudara. Keikhlasan saudara jelas terpancar pada bait-bait yang diungkapkan, dan semoga Allah mengganjarinya.

Saya bersama SS Dr. MAZA membina manhaj jauh sebelum beliau bergelar doktor dan mufti. Pandangan saya sangat terkesan oleh apa yang saya tahu beliau tahu.

Tidakkah kita pernah cuba membayangkan apa yang telah dan sedang dibuat oleh PAS terhadap isu syiah? Tidakkah ada kemungkinan di sana ada pelbagai usaha yang dilakukan oleh PAS untuk menangani hal ini? Saya lontarkan soalan ini kepada yang melihat PAS dari luar, tetapi bagi Dr Maza yang pernah melihat dari dalam, tentunya beliau lebih faham.

Figure seperti Muhammad Sabu mempunyai kekuatan yang cukup untuk beliau bergerak sendiri dan membina pengaruh sendiri. Tidakkah kita pernah terfikir bahawa Muhammad Sabu yang ada sekarang adalah Muhammad Sabu yang berada di dalam lingkungan nasihat dan kawalan pimpinan tertinggi PAS, berbanding membuangnya keluar dan beliau bergerak sendiri? Muhammad Sabu bukan tokoh sehari dua ini. Dia sudah menjadi hardcore PAS sejak sekian lama. Bandingkan pengaruhnya pada tahun 90an (tahun Dr Maza masih di dalam PAS) dengan beliau sekarang? Apakah tidak ada perubahan? Jika ada, dari manakah datangnya perubahan itu?

Tetapi seolah-olah Dr Maza masih merujuk kepada Muhammad Sabu tahun 1995, PAS tahun 1996. Mengapa? Apa implikasinya semua ini? Saya lontarkan semua ini supaya kita fikir.

PAS bukanlah terdiri daripada wajah-wajah yang memusuhi dr maza dan yang dimusuhi dr maza semasa beliau di dalam PAS. PAS adalah sebuah badan yang mempunyai keahlian mencecah hampir 1 juta orang! Ia bukan suatu yang untuk dibanggakan, tetapi terbayangkah anda betapa sulitnya untuk PAS menyeragamkan ahlinya dengan satu manhaj, satu fikrah, satu suara, satu baju, satu serban?
Sebahagian ahli PAS masuk ke dalam PAS melalui pintu Tarbiyah, iaitu mereka yang mengikuti usrah dan sebagainya. Mereka ini boleh dibentuk pemikirannya bahkan memang golongan inilah yang mencorakkan perjuangan PAS. Tetapi jangan lupa, sebagai sebuah parti politik, sebahagian ahli PAS adalah mereka yang masuk ke dalam PAS melalui pintu politik. Mereka masuk kerana kesedaran politik. Mereka mungkin pemandu lori, peniaga, buruh kasar, mungkin juga seorang pensyarah dan profesor tetapi mereka disatukan oleh suatu kesedaran tentang jeleknya kezaliman dan penindasan mereka yang menindas di negara kita.

Apakah mereka ini solat lima waktu? Apakah mereka ini khatam Quran setahun sekali? Apakah mereka ini membaca al-Mathurat? Apakah mereka ini semuanya jelas tentang garis pembeda di antara manhaj Ahli Sunnah wal Jamaah, Syiah, Khawarij dan Murjiah dan Muktazilah? Usahkan saya, Presiden PAS pun sulit mahu menjawabnya. Inilah realitinya, kesan membuka keahlian kepada semua, kerana PAS percaya, penyertaan orang ramai tanpa batas ke dalam PAS atas kesepakatan mereka kepada prinsip yang PAS perjuangkan, adalah satu langkah penting ke arah memperbaiki kehidupan mereka, dan kehidupan Malaysia sebagai sebuah negara.

PAS tidak seperti ABIM atau JIM atau ‘Geng Sunnah yang menarik’ satu jenis keahlian. Orang-orang JIM, ABIM, dan pengikut Dr Maza mempunyai wavelength yang dekat, dan lebih mudah dididik. Ia suatu kelebihan, tetapi ia mungkin tidak mencerminkan realiti sebenar masyarakat. It’s an alternate reality!

Ketika Dr Maza mengkritik PAS, dan kritikannya menjadi ikutan kepada geng Sunnah pula untuk turut sama mengkritik PAS, Dr Maza tahu akan semua realiti di dalam PAS ini.

Maka seruan saya ialah supaya beliau jangan tersilap dengan membayangkan kritikannya kepada PAS adalah kritikannya kepada satu dua tiga atau empat orang pimpinan PAS yang tidak senang dengannya dan dia tidak senang dengan mereka. Tetapi apabila Dr. Maza mengkritik PAS, dia mengkritik 800,000 manusia yang pelbagai kepala, pelbagai taraf pendidikan dan pelbagai ragam.

Jangan campak mancis ke lubuk minyak.

Teguran yang baik adalah amat berguna untuk PAS. Tak ada sekelumit pun di fikiran saya untuk menafikan kelemahan-kelemahan PAS. Bahkan saya bukan di posisi untuk mempertahankan PAS kerana siapalah saya ini? Tetapi teguran menyindir dan seolah-olah tidak faham kepada apa yang ada di dalam PAS menjadikan usaha membawa manhaj tajdid ke dalam PAS hampir mustahil!
Dr Maza yang menyulitkan PAS untuk menerima perjuangannya. Jika Dr Maza yakin manhaj yang dibawanya adalah sesuatu yang baik, tidakkah dia terfikir yang 800 ribu ahli PAS juga patut menerima manhaj yang beliau bawa?

Kita semua tahu, selama ini Tuan Guru Nik Abdul Aziz, Tuan Guru Haji Abdul Hadi dan lain-lain pemimpin utama PAS, mereka juga berpegang dengan manhaj yang sama dengan Dr Maza. Tuan Guru Nik Aziz sedikit demi sedikit cuba memperkenalkan kitab Fiqh Sunnah kepada ahli PAS dan orang Kelantan, untuk menyuntik sedikit idea pemurnian mazhab ke masyarakat. Tetapi kehadiran Dr Maza dengan pandangan-pandangannya yang sering sinis kepada PAS memusnahkan segala-galanya.

 Akhirnya peminat dia tepu Salaf, dan PAS kelihatan sebagai kem khalaf! Apakah manfaat dari semua ini? Jika Dr. Maza lihat orang PAS semakin benci dengan geng Sunnah, jangan salahkan sesiapa, muhasabah balik apa yang beliau sebagai ikon salafi buat kepada PAS. Betapa banyak usaha tuan-tuan guru sebelum ini yang musnah akibat penyemaian benih perbalahan yang ditabur.

Dan semua ini berlaku dalam keadaan Dr Maza bukannnya jahil terhadap apa itu PAS.

Jika bantahan saya ini dinamakan marah, maka saya marah kepada Dr. Maza bukan sebab saya PAS, tetapi sebab saya bermanhaj salaf seperti Dr Maza. Dan pendekatannya menyulitkan penerimaan manhaj Salaf ini di dalam PAS. So, ia bukan isu jemaah centric atau taasub parti atau apa-apa yang seumpama dengannya.

Faisal Tehrani, saya tidak rasa beliau mewakili apa-apa yang bernama PAS. Beliau menulis di blognya sendiri bahawa beliau non partisan, maka treat him as himself, without any association with PAS.
Saya tidak pernah menulis seterang ini.
Moga ada kebaikan, ameen.

Abu Hurairah Al-Malizi

Salam Saifulislam,

Barakallah fik.

Saya tidak tahu Dr MAZA dulu PAS, tetapi masih berpandangan dia seorang alim, dan secara peribadi menganggap dia lebih luas dari segi ilmu dan pemikiran daripada kedua-dua Syaikhain PAS, serta para ulama lain. Pengetahuan agama kita masih cetek, mungkin sebab itu tidak dapat menghayati dengan baik pandangan-pandangannya.

Kealiman tidak diukur dari segi umur, Ibnu Taimiah pada usia belasan tahun lagi lebih alim daripada para ulama sezamannya.

Dr MAZA mungkin sudah bosan dengan ulama-ulama PAS yang jumud dalam berdakwah, yang hanya pentingkan hudud dan mengetepikan soal-soal lain yang lebih afdal buat masa ini.

Kalau saudara ada pengalaman berdakwah dengan bukan Islam secara praktikal atau dengan yang Islam tetapi jauh daripada Islam, saudara akan lebih memahami buah pemikiran Dr MAZA.

Namun dia bukan maksum, dan saya sendiri akan tegur dia bila berhubung dengan dia nanti.

Saya akan tulis artikel tentang Fokus utama yang sepatutnya buat Gerakan Islam iaitu menjadi Tawhid-centric lebih dulu daripada menjadi Ummah-centric atau Jamaah-centric. Insyaallah akan terbitkan di www.abu-hurairah-al-malizi.blogspot.com

I feel the need to raise mistakes made even by Imam Al-Banna and Syed Qutb and their divergence from way of the salaf. They are forgiven Insyaallah for making ijtihad, and perhaps the truth did not reach them. However their mistakes need to be clarified for us to learn.

Saya pernah terlibat juga dengan IRC dan PAS, tetapi lebih banyak dengan Muslim Association of Britain, saf Al-Ikhwan di sana , selama hampir 10 tahun di UK . Dan rapat juga dengan anak-anak murid Syeikh Rabi dan Syeikh Muqbil, para ulama 'Traditionalist salafis' yang tsiqah.

Sila lawat www.the-muslim-brotherhood.blogspot.com

'Teguran' ikhlas saya untuk Al-Ikhwan amnya, Arab dan bukan Arab supaya menjadi lebih Sunnatik dan komprehensif, serta maju dari segi-segi bisnes, sains dan teknologi. Teguran daripada yang pernah berada dalam Al-Ikhwan.

Faisal Tehrani orang kuat PAS semasa dia di KISAS dulu, dan saya 'junior' dia. Bagus dia isytiharkan dirinya 'non-partisan', tetapi pada masa yang sama PAS perlu 'monitor' pendapat-pendapat dia supaya tidak ambil kesempatan menyebarkan fikrah Syiah di dalam Harakah Daily umpamanya.

Ustaz Abdul Hadi dan Ustaz Nik Aziz agak lembut dengan Syiah, itu kelemahan yang perlu diperbaiki. Kalau Ibnu Taimiah masih hidup, saya yakin dia akan perangi Iran dulu sebelum Amerika dan Israel , sebagaimana Salahuddin menghancurkan Fatimiah dulu sebelum Salibiah.

Sila tunggu buku saya:
www.menantiimamke-12online.webs.com

Harap kita dapat bersemuka suatu hari nanti.

Perlu dibuat sesuatu tentang para pengikut PAS yang 800 000 itu, apabila dibiarkan saya khuatir akan jadi musibah kepada bukan Islam atau mereka yang jahil tentang Islam.

May Allah accept your good deeds and make you a scholar fighting on His way, and be a proof to People of Innovations!

Uhibbuk fillah Akhi Saifulislam!

Response to Daniel Pipes 1

Submitted by Ahmad Mokhzani Abdullah (Malaysia), Oct 23, 2007 at 21:25

Relating to my personal research on the Biblical Antichrist, I conclude beyond reasonable doubt that the Antichrist as prophesied in the Bible and by the Prophet Muhammad, is both Moshiach of the Jews and The Twelth Imam of the Shiites.
Shiism of Khomeini diverges considerably in creed from Islam of the Prophet Muhammad, and it is heartbreaking to see so-called Christian scholars slandering Islam based on perversions of Shiite Ayatollahs.
The Antichrist will initially emerge in Iran as The New Cyrus and The Twelth Imam and will then enter Israel to be crowned as Moshiach of the Zionists and finally Christ of The Holy See!
The Antichrist is our future universal tribulation, not just of the Muslims or Jews or Christians!
Please visit my webs:
http://www.antichrist-and-catholicism.blogspot.com
http://www.antichrist-and-zionism.blogspot.com
http://www.antichrist-and-shiism.blogspot.com

Ahmad Mokhzani Abdullah,
Researcher, Author, Investor and Entrepreneur

Response to Anwar Ibrahim by Ahmad Nor

The recent bombings of Lebanon by America and Israel was not in the interest of destroying Hizbullah, the proof is that not even 1 percent of Hizbullah military positions had been touched (according to an interview with a Lebanese minister during the aftermath of the war), the real aim to the best of my research is to annihilate the innocent civilians, most being Sunnis, and to strengthen the position of Hizbullah itself.
Hizbullah was created by Iran, and has been financed by the latter ever since. There are documents proving secret alliance between United States and Iran in invading Iraq and Afghanistan for instance, one such proof is this article from Al-Jazeerah. Please visit:http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FA3DCC84-3173-4BE6-9022-C00A94B71234.htm
Iran’s position as a fundamentalist Islamic state is questionable. Most Iranian citizens have left Islam, leaving the Mullahs governing Iran.
It is interesting to note that Mankind’s greatest enemy, the Antichrist (Islamic ‘Al-Masih Ad-Dajjal’ or Malay ‘Dajal’)according to our Messenger, Muhammad p.b.u.h. will emerge in Isfahan, which is in Iran now.
Thus that makes Hizbullah’s so-called defence of Islam questionable, first because of their slandering of the Companions and secondly, due to their hostorical relations with Iran.

Rather than attacking, it’s better that you increase your knowledge first of diverse Islamic sects and Islam itself and of course the current Global politics. And find which sect resembles most ‘Ahlussunnah Waljamaah’, which is the only Saved sect.
What the Islamic world is facing today cannot be looked from ‘black and white’ perspective. The ummah is facing enemies from all sides, external (America and Israel) as well as internal (those who wear the cloak of Islam, but despise the Companions of Muhammad). Internal enemies are more dangerous.
Tell me, what has Iran done so far that we can be proud of? From the so-called Islamic Revolution (how can it be called ‘Islamic’ when Khomeini himself called Abu Bakr and Umar ‘kafir’?), until the Rushdie affair and recently the nuclear threats, they have further distorted the image of Islam to be religion of extremism and violence.
I don’t really know who you are, if you are Shiite and sympathetic to Iran, I have nothing to say except Allah may guide you.
Just increase your knowledge and keep learning even if that involves ‘constant theorising’, because only by doing that we can keep on advancing.
As for me, to the best of my research, Iran is NOT an Islamic state, and we must stick to the Prophet Muhammad’s warning that ‘Dajjal’ will appear in Isfahan.Even if you differ, try if you can to differ in a more ethical way, better than voice to Anwar Ibrahim like an old woman.

Saya fikir DSAI perlu buat ‘autopsy’ terhadap prestasi PKR sepanjang penubuhannya, juga terhadap kemungkinan wujudnya faktor-faktor dalaman yang menyebabkan tersingkirnya DSAI daripada Kerajaan.
Semasa era Khilafah Usmaniah dulu, ketika berlakunya kekalahan dalam peperangan, usaha dibuat untuk mengkaji kelemahan-kelemahan sendiri, bukan menyalahkan pihak-pihak musuh. Saya fikir kita perlu lakukan perkara yang sama.
Ini antara faktor-faktor yang saya fikir sebabkan kejatuhan kita:
1) Meningkatnya materialisme di kalangan para aktivis Islam terutamanya yang menjadi para penyokong DSAI, walaupun mereka yang sudah ’senior’, baik di kalangan ABIM atau JIM. Islam menggalakkan umatnya menjadi kaya tetapi tidak sampai meletakkan kekayaan dalam hati. Saya fikir kita perlu bersihkan diri daripada ’status consciousness’ atau keinginan untuk memiliki kereta atau rumah mewah serta penyakit-penyakit kronik lain. Para aktivis Islam perlu memiliki sifat ‘qanaah’ dan kalau mahu kaya pun, masuk ke dalam bisnes dan sedekah sedikit keuntungan bisnes untuk usaha-usaha kemanusiaan. Kita tidak seharusnya cepat lupa daratan, bila sudah naik sedikit. Bill Gates sedekah lebih kurang $20 bilion setiap tahun untuk kerja-kerja kebajikan, dan baru-baru ini Warren Buffett, hampir 90% daripada hartanya diwasiatkan untuk kebajikan. Dia kedua terkaya di dunia. Rumah Buffett di Omaha bernilai tidak sampai RM 300 ribu sahaja, berbeza dengan rumah para Dato’ (Melayu terutamanya) di Malaysia.
2) Sikap terburu-terburu DSAI serta para pengikut dalam UMNO ketika menanti pengambilahan kuasa daripada Dr. Mahathir. Kita perlu bersabar dan fikir ‘long term’ dalam apa jua perkara. Gerakan Zionis berjaya kerana mereka sabar dan fikir ‘long term’ sebelum bertapak di Palestin. Zionisme sebenarnya lanjutan daripada Perang Salib yang bermula pada 1095 Masihi.
3) Seperti yang saya sebut sebelum ini, ‘naivety’ terhadap mereka yang licik berpolitik seperti Dr. Mahathir. Kita perlu banyakkan penyelidikan tentang ’secret societies’ dan faham pengaruh mereka dalam geo-politik Dunia termasuk di tanahair. Dr. Sulaiman Nordin banyak menulis tentang ini, juga Harun Yahya dari Turki. Dr. Mahathir ‘berehat’ selama 2 bulan di luar negeri sebelum Dato’ jatuh, mungkin sebahagian daripada rancangannya untuk melihat apa yang akan Dato’ buat apabila berkuasa. Dato’ perlu kuatkan lagi pengaruh Dato’ di kalangan semua lapisan masyarakat serta di dalam UMNO, PAS dan PKR. Nixon gagal menjatuhkan Kissinger kerana kuatnya pengaruh Kissinger di kalangan anggota-anggota Senat.
4) Kurangnya tarbiah di kalangan segelintir para pengikut Dato’ dalam UMNO yang bukan daripada latar belakang Gerakan Islam, yang sekarang ini berada dalam PKR. Saya tidak gemar sebut kelemahan-kelemahan mereka, biar DSAI yang sendiri perhati dan tegur dengan hikmah. Bagaimana mahu harapkan kemenangan kalau kita cinta kuasa sama dengan para anggota UMNO lain? Cinta terhadap Allah itu yang patut diberi keutamaan, dan itu menuntut kita berlaku adil terhadap mereka yang bukan Islam juga.
5) ‘Obsession’ terhadap kuasa, hingga mengabaikan tuntutan-tuntutan lain yang lebih daruri, yang paling utama reformasi individu-individu. Allah hanya akan mengubah nasib sesuatu kaum/parti hanya apabila individu-individu dalam kaum/parti itu berubah. Disebabkan faktor ini juga, saya tolak Iran sebagai Negara Islam yang ‘legitimate’; Masyarakat Islam yang dibina Nabi kita, dibina setelah menghormati ayat Allah tersebut, Baginda tidak paksakan hudud misalnya ke atas para sahabat dalam keadaaan akidah serta kerohanian mereka masih belum kukuh. Saya banyak bercampur dengan para pelajar dari Iran di Manchester, mereka banyak melapurkan tentang rasuah di kalangan Mullah sendiri, serta larinya rakyat Iran daripada ‘Islam’ (sebenarnya ‘Syiah’).
6) Kurang juga ’self account’ terhadap kelemahan-kelemahan kita sendiri. Kita perlu kembali kepada Allah terlebih dulu, sebelum melihat faktor-faktor lain.
Saya ingin sarankan Dato’ agar menubuhkan Kumpulan Bisnes PKR sendiri, mungkin tidak sehebat Al-Abrar Group International, tapi cukup untuk bebas daripada bergantung kepada derma semata-mata, dan juga untuk menghidupkan ‘entrepreneurial drive’ antara anggota-anggota muda dalam PKR sama ada di kalangan Cina, Melayu, India dan sebagainya. ‘Excessive cash flow’ yang kita dapat boleh kita guna untuk beli syarikat-syarikat lain, dan selebihnya untuk kegunaan Parti. Kita perlu bina kerjasama dengan para korporat Melayu yang salih seperti Syed Mokhtar Al-Bokhari, yang tidak melihat perbezaan parti. Saya tidak nampak UMNO akan dapat bertahan lama, era abad ke-21 bukan era ‘Malay Dilemma’ yang nasionalis lagi, tetapi era ‘The Asian Renaissance’ yang Internasionalis. Tidak keberatan kalau saya katakan ‘UMNO is the past of Malaysia but PKR is the future of Malaysia’.
Saya harap Dato’ jika ada masa lapang dapat buat penyelidikan daripada Sahih Muslim dan Sahih Bukhari tentang ramalan-ramalan Baginda s.a.w. berkaitan dengan Dajal, sebagainya. Kata-kata Nabi tentang ‘future Global events’ patut diberi keutamaan daripada Francis Fukiyama, John Naisbitt serta Samuel Huntington. Saya khuatir kalau Dajal muncul dari Iran, sebagai ‘Imam ke-12′ yang ditunggu Presiden Ahmadinejad dengan kesalihannya, dan akan mengelabui mata umat Islam. Baginda s.a.w. kata Dajal akan muncul di kalangan umatnya (bukan di kalangan bukan Islam), di antara Syria dan Iraq, dan mengikut riwayat lain, di Isfahan, Iran. Kesemuanya daripada hadis-hadis sahih. Iran ada hubungan di belakang tabir dengan Israel semenjak Khomeini lagi; umat Islam dibuai mimpi tatkala Ahmadinejad bersandiwara dengan Israel. Tidak mengapa kalau lebih sedikit daripad segi berteori, lebih baik saya fikir daripada banyak bercakap dan terus menyerang, serta tidak banyak membaca. Saya ada bukti menunjukkan hubungan rahsia tersebut. Nabi ada sebut tentang munculnya Dajal nanti di kalangan Kharawij (Muslim yang ekstrimis dan terkeluar daripada Islam).

The Nostradamus Code

Michel de Nostredame, better known as Nostradamus, was a 16th-century French physician and seer whose enigmatic quatrains have intrigued scholars, historians, and conspiracy theorists for centuries. His most famous work, Les Prophéties, published in 1555, contains a series of cryptic four-line verses (quatrains) that many believe predict significant world events, including the rise of the Antichrist, World War Three, and the destruction of the Vatican Church. While skeptics argue that his predictions are vague and open to interpretation, believers insist that his prophecies hold an uncanny accuracy in foretelling global catastrophes and major historical shifts.

The Life and Work of Nostradamus

Born in 1503 in Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, France, Nostradamus was educated in medicine and astrology. He gained fame as a healer during the plague outbreaks in Europe and later transitioned into writing astrological predictions. His reputation as a prophet grew over time, particularly as his quatrains seemed to align with historical events long after his death in 1566.

Nostradamus claimed that his visions were inspired by a combination of biblical texts, astrological calculations, and meditative practices. His writing style was deliberately obscure, incorporating anagrams, symbolism, and references to multiple languages to evade persecution by the Catholic Church.

Predictions of the Antichrist

One of Nostradamus’s most widely discussed prophecies involves the rise of an Antichrist figure who will bring about global conflict and suffering. In multiple quatrains, he describes a tyrannical leader emerging from the East, waging war and conquering vast territories. Some interpretations link this figure to historical leaders such as Napoleon and Hitler, while others speculate that the real Antichrist has yet to appear.

A frequently cited quatrain states:

“Out of the country of Greater Arabia, Shall be born a strong master of Muhammad’s law, He will vex Spain, conquer Granada, And more by sea against the Ligurian people.”

This has led some researchers to believe that Nostradamus foresaw the rise of a powerful Islamic leader who would challenge the West. However, others argue that such quatrains are metaphorical rather than literal.

World War Three and Global Catastrophe

Another recurring theme in Nostradamus’s quatrains is the prediction of a third global war. Some of his verses appear to describe a massive conflict involving nuclear weapons, biological warfare, and widespread devastation. His prophecies often mention battles in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, hinting at an apocalyptic scenario.

One quatrain states:

“The great war will start in France, And all Europe will tremble in fear, A powerful league will march through the land, And Russia shall be greatly afflicted.”

Believers argue that this could point to a future confrontation between Western powers and an Eastern alliance, potentially involving Russia, China, and other nations. The rise of military tensions in the 21st century has led some to claim that Nostradamus foresaw modern geopolitical struggles long before they unfolded.

The Destruction of the Vatican Church

A particularly controversial prophecy attributed to Nostradamus concerns the destruction of the Vatican Church. Some quatrains allude to an internal schism within the Church, followed by its eventual downfall through external attack or divine retribution.

One such verse reads:

“In the holy place of sacred Rome, Great fire shall burn the halls of stone, The clergy scattered, the city torn, A new leader arises, by force reborn.”

This has been interpreted by some as a warning of an attack on the Vatican, possibly through terrorism, war, or a catastrophic natural disaster. Others believe it hints at a future Pope who will reform the Church drastically, causing division among its followers.

Skepticism and Alternate Interpretations

While Nostradamus’s predictions continue to captivate millions, skeptics argue that his writings are too vague to be considered true prophecies. They contend that his quatrains can be retroactively applied to almost any event, making them more a work of literary ambiguity than genuine foresight.

Additionally, many of his so-called accurate predictions have been altered or misquoted over time. Some quatrains have been taken out of context, mistranslated, or even fabricated entirely to fit modern events.

Conclusion: A Legacy of Mystery and Debate

Whether Nostradamus was a genuine prophet or a clever poet with a keen understanding of historical patterns, his legacy endures as one of the most fascinating enigmas of esoteric literature. His quatrains have sparked endless debate and speculation, fueling theories about the fate of humanity and the world’s future. While the ultimate truth of his prophecies remains uncertain, the intrigue surrounding Nostradamus’s work ensures that his predictions will continue to be analyzed for generations to come.

We have here The Nostradamus Code for the entertainment of our readers.

DOWNLOAD LINKS
The original works of Nostradamus
The Nostradamus Code: World War III

Muslim Heritage

Access biographies of Islam's countless universal geniuses, as well as their scientific achievements
Get to know Ibn Taimiyyah, Al-Ghazali, Avicenna and other Islamic sages of the past
Rebuild the future Islamic civilization by analyzing the past, successes and failures
Islamize the present materialistic civilization coming from the West
Work of Professor Salim Al-Hassani, engineering professor in UMIST

Muslim Heritage

Secret Khomeini-Israel Relationships

Is Iran really such an avowed enemy of the Zionist state?
If it really is, how can the 2 non-Arab Middle Eastern powers explain Iran-Contra scandal happening even during Khomeini's era?
What's the significance of the authentic hadith predicting the Antichrist to be emerging from Al-Yahudiyyah in Isfahan, Iran? What's the significance of the authentic hadith predicting the Antichrist to be emerging amongst the Prophetic Kharijites?
Did the Kharijites die out or did they through 'taqiyyah' or dissimulation emerged as another deviant Islamic sect? Perhaps the Shiites?

References
Israel and Iran – Ideological Foes or Strategic Rivals?

As-Syafii and Al-Ghazali

Albeit being recognized as Founder of the Syafii school of thought, As-Syafii did not during his lifetime profess the same Asyari creed as that of Al-Ghazali, and his methodology of deriving 'ijtihad' directly from the Quran and the Sunnah as understood by pious predecessors differed greatly from that of Al-Ghazali who derived his by blind imitation mainly of As-Syafii's legal rulings
As-Syafii himself followed the creed of the salaf, as revived by Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal and later on defended by Syaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taimiyyah, while Al-Ghazali had been staunch defender of the Asyari creed, founded by Ibn Kullab but falsely attributed to Imam Al-Asyari
During the lifetime of Ibn Taimiyyah, Syafii school of thought had been subverted by the Asyaris who sought to get Syafiis to follow their creed, but the effort was made fruitless by the joint efforts of the traditionalists (salafis) in both Hanbali and Syafii schools of thought
Al-Ghazali belongs to Syafiis who are Asyaris in creed, while Syafii scholars like Ibn Kathir belongs to Syafiis who follow the footsteps of the Founder, Imam As-Syafii whose creed did not differ from that of the salaf, as defended by Ibn Taimiyyah
The book will be a real eye opener to both Salafis and Asyaris of Syafii school of thought and also to Muslims of other Sunni fiqh denominations
Majority of today's so-called Syafiis are not really following Imam As-Syafii himself in creed and methodology, rather they're following Imam Al-Ghazali

References

Modern Israel is the fulfilment of The Twelth Imam's advent

A leading Shiite Ayatullah became a whistleblower and wrote a revealing book based on Shiite sources, and concludes that the establishment of the state of Israel is the fulfilment of The Twelth Imam prophecies

-

The Book in Arabic

Other books free

Tangan Khomeini berlumuran dengan darah para ulama Ahlussunnah

Kejayaan Revolusi Iran 1979 berjaya mengasaskan buat pertama kalinya sebuah 'Republik Islam' yang dipimpin para ulama, setelah jatuhnya Khilafah Islamiah Usmaniah pada 1928.

Akhirnya, setelah lebih daripada separuh abad lamanya, umat Islam berjaya mendirikan semula Khilafah bukan di negara Ahlussunnah tetapi di Iran, yang menjadi pusat Syiah semenjak kurun ke-16 Masihi.

Adakah Republik Islam Syiah tersebut benar-benar Islam atau lanjutan semata-mata daripada Kerajaan Syiah Safawi yang membunuh dan memaksa jutaan rakyat Iran yang Ahlussunnah (serta Syafii dari segi fiqh) pada kurun ke-16 hingga menjadi Syiah beberapa tahun kemudiannya? Mengapakah Kerajaan Safawi menukarkan ibu pemerintahan mereka ke Isfahan, tempat yang akan menyaksikan kemunculan Dajjal?

Gerakan Turki Muda 1908 yang menjatuhkan Kerajaan Usmaniah diketuai oleh orang-orang Yahudi rahsia (antaranya Mustafa Kamal 'Ataturk') yang 'memeluk' Islam beberapa kurun dahulu setelah pemimpin utama mereka, Shabtai Zvi dipaksa memeluk Islam atau dibunuh (oleh seorang Sultan Usmaniah). Mereka dikenali sebagai 'Donomeh' semenjak bertukar agama secara 'rasmi' kepada Islam.
Orang-orang Yahudi Donomeh berjaya merahsiakan keyahudiaan mereka daripada pengetahuan awam dengan mempraktikkan ajaran-ajaran Islam seperti solat lima waktu dan puasa secara terbuka dan dengan penuh kesungguhan, walaupun masih mengamalkan agama Yahudi di belakang tabir.

Berbalik kepada Revolusi Iran, kita paparkan selanjutnya artikel (dalam bahasa Inggeris) daripada seorang ulama Ahlussunnah dari Iran yang menerangkan dengan jelas pengalaman-pengalamannya sebelum dan selepas Revolusi, serta segala pahit maung yang dihadapi para ulama Ahlussunnah di bawah pemerintahan kuku besi Syiah ala Khomeini. Kita harap para aktivis Islam terutamanya para pengagum Khomeini di dalam PAS serta di Universiti Malaya dapat membaca dengan hati terbuka artikel ini. Kita seharusnya ingat tentang ramalan Baginda s.a.w. yang Dajjal akan muncul dari Isfahan, Iran dengan 70,000 orang Yahudi (Sahih Muslim).

Sila ke sini.

JAKIM menerbitkan buku tentang kesesatan Syiah

JAKIM menerbitkan sebuah buku bertajuk Penjelasan terhadap fahaman Syiah untuk memberi maklumat dan penjelasan kepada orang ramai mengenai fahaman Syiah supaya orang Islam dan masyarakat menjauhi dan tidak terpengaruh dengan fahaman ini dan menyedarkan mereka yang terbabit bahawa pegangan fahaman mereka adalah bercanggah dengan ajaran Islam sebenar.

Umat Islam di tanahair perlu disedarkan tentang segala kesesatan Agama Syiah, memandangkan semakin berkembangnya agama ini di kalangan para intelektual terutamanya di Universiti Malaya.
Revolusi Iran 1979 berjaya mengembangkan serta mengukuhkan pengaruh Syiah di Malaysia, dengan mengeksploitasikan semangat para aktivis Islam yang ikhlas dalam usaha mereka untuk membina semula Negara Islam, tetapi jahil tentang selok belok akidah serta manhaj para salaf.

Sesungguhnya, akidah perkara pertama yang ditekankan Rasulullah s.a.w. kepada para sahabat, lama sebelum Baginda s.a.w. mengasaskan Negara Islam di Madinah. Terburu-buru membina Negara Islam tanpa penekanan terhadap akidah murni yang dibawa para generasi terawal Islam (salafussalih) merupakan satu bidaah, dan berpotensi menghancurkan Islam dalam jangka masa panjang.
Kita mesti kembali kepada Kitab Allah serta Sunnah Nabi Muhammad s.a.w. berdasarkan fahaman generasi terawal Islam; kata-kata para ulama yang datang kemudian tidak seharusnya menjadi sandaran walau seramai manapun pengikut mereka atau setinggi manapun kedudukan mereka dalam parti (Islam).

The salafism and sufism of Ibn Taimiyyah

The perception of Ibn Taimiyyah as being entirely opposed to Sufism has long been a subject of debate among scholars and historians. While he is often portrayed as a fierce critic of Sufism, new research by an orientalist and several trustworthy Sunni scholars suggests otherwise. This research sheds light on a different aspect of Ibn Taimiyyah—one that not only acknowledges his defense of Sufism but also suggests that he himself was well-versed in (sunnatic) Sufism, lived an ascetic life, and even wrote extensively on the discipline. This article explores the findings that challenge the commonly held narrative about Ibn Taimiyyah and his relationship with Sufism.

Ibn Taimiyyah’s Defense of Sufism

Despite his criticism of some Sufi practices, Ibn Taimiyyah recognized Sufism as an essential part of Islam when practiced in accordance with the Sunnah. In his various writings, he praised early Sufi masters such as Al-Junayd and Abdul Qadir Jilani, distinguishing between authentic Sufism and the excesses that had crept into the tradition over time. Ibn Taimiyyah's critique was primarily aimed at innovations (bid'ah) and deviations from the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), rather than Sufism itself as a spiritual discipline.

In his works, Ibn Taimiyyah often referred to the importance of purification of the soul (tazkiyyah) and spiritual excellence (ihsan), concepts that form the foundation of Sufism. He acknowledged the value of dhikr (remembrance of Allah), muraqabah (spiritual vigilance), and other aspects of traditional Sufi practice that align with the Qur'an and Sunnah. His opposition was directed at practices that deviated from these principles, such as excessive veneration of saints, seeking intercession through the deceased, and some esoteric interpretations of Islam that lacked scriptural backing.

The Ascetic Life of Ibn Taimiyyah

One of the key arguments supporting Ibn Taimiyyah’s affinity with Sufism is his ascetic lifestyle. He lived a life of simplicity, rejecting material comforts, and dedicating himself to worship, scholarship, and teaching. His commitment to self-discipline and his rejection of worldly pleasures align closely with the Sufi ideal of zuhd (detachment from worldly desires). He spent much of his life in prison due to his firm stance against political and theological corruption, further highlighting his commitment to truth over personal gain.

This austere lifestyle is in stark contrast to many contemporary Sufi figures who, as critics argue, have become immersed in materialism, fame, and the pursuit of worldly status. Ibn Taimiyyah’s life serves as a powerful example of true Sufism, which emphasizes spiritual refinement and sincerity over external displays of mysticism.

Writings on Sufism and Spiritual Purification

Contrary to popular belief, Ibn Taimiyyah wrote extensively on Sufism and spiritual purification. His works include discussions on the necessity of sincerity (ikhlas), reliance on Allah (tawakkul), and spiritual struggle (mujahadah). These themes are central to classical Sufi teachings, reinforcing the argument that he was not opposed to Sufism itself but rather to its corruptions.

One of his significant contributions is his commentary on Abdul Qadir Jilani’s works, where he elaborates on the necessity of adhering to the Qur'an and Sunnah in Sufi practices. Ibn Taimiyyah held Jilani in high regard, considering him one of the most exemplary figures in Islamic spirituality. Additionally, his discussions on al-Junayd’s teachings demonstrate a nuanced understanding of Sufism that goes beyond mere polemics.

Recognition by Ash‘ari Sufi Scholars

Prominent Ash‘ari Sufi scholars such as Nuh Ha Mim Keller have acknowledged Ibn Taimiyyah’s engagement with Sufism and his defense of its foundational principles. Keller, in particular, has pointed out that Ibn Taimiyyah’s critique was directed at misuses of Sufism rather than the discipline itself. Such recognition from scholars outside the Salafi tradition further supports the notion that Ibn Taimiyyah was not an outright opponent of Sufism but rather an advocate for its purification and reform.

A True Salafi and a True Sufi?

Ibn Taimiyyah’s unique position in Islamic scholarship allows him to be viewed as both a Salafi and a Sufi in the truest sense. His adherence to the creed of the Salaf (pious predecessors) and his rigorous commitment to the Qur'an and Sunnah align with the Salafi methodology. At the same time, his deep engagement with spiritual purification, his recognition of early Sufi figures, and his ascetic lifestyle align with the core values of true Sufism.

The concept of tasfiyyah (purification of Islamic teachings) and tarbiyyah (spiritual upbringing), terms later emphasized by scholars such as Muhammad Nasiruddin al-Albani, reflect Ibn Taimiyyah’s dual role as a reformer of both theology and spirituality. His vision was not to eradicate Sufism but to restore it to its original purity, free from innovations and distortions.

Conclusion

The conventional portrayal of Ibn Taimiyyah as wholly anti-Sufi is increasingly being challenged by new research and scholarly analysis. He emerges as a complex figure who upheld both the intellectual rigor of Salafism and the spiritual depth of Sufism. His writings, lifestyle, and defense of classical Sufi masters reveal that he saw true Sufism as an integral part of Islam. In a time when Sufism has, in some cases, been distorted by materialism and excess, Ibn Taimiyyah’s example stands as a powerful reminder of what genuine Islamic spirituality entails.

Thus, far from being a mere opponent of Sufism, Ibn Taimiyyah may well be regarded as one of its most sincere reformers—embodying both the scholarly depth of a true Salafi and the spiritual integrity of a true Sufi.

We invite visitors to research:
Ibn Taymiyah
GEORGE MAKDISI
The Place of Tasawwuf in Traditional Islam
Nuh Ha Mim Keller on the sufism of Ibn Taimiyyah
The Debate with Ibn Taymiyya
The Testimony of Ibn Taymiyya to Ibn `Ata' Allah: Shaykh Ibn Taymiyya had been imprisoned in Alexandria. When the Sultan pardoned him, he came back to Cairo. At the time of the evening prayer he went to al-Azhar mosque where salat al-maghrib was being led by Shaykh Ahmad Ibn `Ata Allah al-Iskandari. Following the prayer, Ibn `Ata' Allah was surprised to discover that Ibn Taymiyya had been praying behind him
ON TASAWWUF
Shaykh Yusuf al-Qaradawi
Sufi quotations of Ibn Taimiyyah
Amazing words
Pandangan Ibn Taymiyyah Dalam Tasawuf
Hafiz Firdaus Abdullah

The genealogy of The Twelth Imam of Shiite Muslims (He is Jewish Matrilineally)

The Twelfth Imam, also known as Muhammad al-Mahdi in Shia Islam, is one of the most fascinating and enigmatic figures in religious and eschatological discourse. His prophesied role as the savior of humanity and the restorer of justice has inspired centuries of devotion, speculation, and scholarship. Beyond his theological significance, the intricate and multicultural genealogy attributed to him offers a profound narrative that ties together some of the most significant civilizations and religious traditions in human history. Let us explore this remarkable character—his lineage and the broader implications of his heritage—to better understand how he might resonate as a unifying figure across religious and cultural divides.

The Maternal Lineage: Jewish and Roman Roots

According to Shia tradition, the mother of the Twelfth Imam was Narjis (or Nargis) Khatun, a figure of considerable intrigue and mystery. Some accounts describe her as a Roman princess, tracing her paternal lineage to the Byzantine imperial family, possibly even to a Roman emperor. This connection symbolizes a bridge to the Greco-Roman world, a civilization foundational to Western culture and thought. Additionally, an even more striking claim emerges in certain Islamic traditions that Narjis was maternally descended from Saint Peter, one of the closest disciples of Jesus Christ and a foundational figure in Christianity.

If this maternal descent is accepted, the Twelfth Imam can be regarded as having Jewish ancestry through Narjis. In Jewish tradition, one’s Jewish identity is matrilineal; that is, it is determined by the mother. This criterion would make the Twelfth Imam Jewish under rabbinical law, even if he himself does not adhere to the Jewish faith. Judaism holds that a person retains their Jewish identity regardless of their personal beliefs or religious practices. This connection is deeply significant, as it could situate the Twelfth Imam as a figure of interest within Jewish messianic expectations.

Moreover, the Roman link through Narjis’ paternal ancestry adds another dimension. Rome’s profound historical and spiritual influence—as the seat of both imperial power and later, the center of Western Christianity—imbues this lineage with symbolic weight. In Narjis, we find an intersection of Jewish, Christian, and Roman identities, creating a unique maternal heritage for the Twelfth Imam.

The Paternal Lineage: Arab and Persian Nobility

On his father’s side, the Twelfth Imam’s lineage is rooted in the family of the Prophet Muhammad. His father, Hasan al-Askari, was the eleventh Shia Imam and a direct descendant of the Prophet through Imam Hussein. This connection places the Twelfth Imam firmly within the Arab and Islamic tradition. The Prophet Muhammad’s family, known as the Ahl al-Bayt, holds a central position in Islamic theology, particularly in Shia Islam, where they are venerated as exemplars of piety and leadership.

Adding to this illustrious heritage is the reported marriage of Imam Hussein to Shahrbanu, a daughter of Yazdegerd III, the last emperor of the Sassanid Persian dynasty. This union symbolically and genealogically unites the Arab and Persian worlds, two civilizations with deep historical and cultural ties but also a history of rivalry. Through this paternal lineage, the Twelfth Imam embodies a synthesis of Arab and Persian identities, standing as a bridge between these two great cultures.

A Genealogical Convergence of Civilizations

The Twelfth Imam’s ancestry thus represents a remarkable convergence of four major civilizations and religious traditions: Jewish, Roman, Arab, and Persian. Each of these lineages carries profound symbolic significance:

1. Jewish Heritage: Through his maternal lineage, the Twelfth Imam can be seen as connected to the Jewish tradition. This connection raises the question of whether he could be seen as the Moshiach (Messiah) awaited in Judaism, a figure prophesied to restore Israel and bring about an era of global peace.

2. Roman Heritage: The Roman lineage through Narjis ties the Twelfth Imam to Western civilization and Christianity. This connection invites speculation on whether he might resonate with Christian expectations of the Second Coming of Christ.

3. Arab Heritage: His paternal descent from the Prophet Muhammad situates him as a central figure in Islamic eschatology. In Shia Islam, he is the Mahdi, the guided one who will emerge to establish justice and equity on earth.

4. Persian Heritage: The Persian lineage through Shahrbanu connects the Twelfth Imam to Zoroastrianism and its messianic figure, the Saoshyant, who is prophesied to bring about the final renovation of the world.

A Universal Savior?

Given this unique ancestral composition, the Twelfth Imam stands as a figure of profound potential for unity across religious and cultural boundaries. His Jewish heritage could make him a point of interest for Jews awaiting the Moshiach. His Roman lineage connects him to the heart of Western civilization and Christianity, where the anticipation of the return of Christ remains central. His Arab and Persian heritage solidify his role in Islamic and Zoroastrian eschatology, respectively.

This convergence of identities raises an intriguing question: Could the Twelfth Imam simultaneously claim the roles of Moshiach, Christ, and Saoshyant? Each of these figures is associated with the restoration of justice, peace, and divine order, albeit within their respective religious frameworks. If the Twelfth Imam were to present himself as fulfilling these roles, he could potentially serve as a unifying figure, transcending the historical and theological divides that separate these traditions.

Theological and Eschatological Implications

The possibility of the Twelfth Imam being recognized across multiple religious traditions raises complex theological questions. For instance, how would his claims be received by adherents of these faiths, each of which has its own distinct expectations for their savior figure? Could such a figure reconcile the doctrinal differences between these religions, or would his claims exacerbate tensions?

In Judaism, the Messiah is expected to be a human leader who restores Israel and brings peace to the world. Christianity’s Christ is both divine and human, whose Second Coming heralds the final judgment and the establishment of God’s kingdom. In Islam, the Mahdi is a divinely guided leader who restores justice but operates within an Islamic framework. Zoroastrianism’s Saoshyant is a world-renovator who leads humanity in the final battle against evil. Reconciling these differing eschatological visions would require a figure of extraordinary charisma and wisdom.

Conclusion

The Twelfth Imam’s genealogical heritage positions him as a unique and compelling figure in the annals of religious and cultural history. His maternal descent from Jewish and Roman lineages, combined with his paternal Arab and Persian ancestry, creates a symbolic union of some of the most influential civilizations and traditions. This extraordinary lineage, coupled with his prophesied role as a universal savior, invites profound speculation about his potential to bridge divides and fulfill the messianic hopes of multiple faiths.

While the ultimate realization of these possibilities remains within the realm of eschatological speculation, the Twelfth Imam’s story offers a powerful narrative of unity and interconnectedness. In a world often divided by religious and cultural differences, the idea of a figure who embodies the shared heritage and hopes of humanity is both intriguing and inspiring.

YOU GIVE THE ANSWER

Blogs of active participation by Al-Malizi

Anwar Ibrahim

Daniel Pipes

Saifulislam.Com

Tariq Ramadan

al-ahkam.net

The 1948 Deir Yassin Massacre and Gog and Magog

Despite being one of the greatest tragedies befalling the Muslims, the massacre also served the mission of Zionists in establishing the terrorist State of Israel. They strove hard to drive away the Arabs from their homeland in order to make way clear for the Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe. Two Zionist terrorist organizations, Irgun and Haganah were resposible for the 1948 carnage, killing hundreds of innocent men, women and children while leaving many orphans.
Terrorism of this nature and degree was unheard of among the Jews living during the Prophet Muhammad's time. What kind of Jews are today's Jews? Why are they much more cruel and violent in treating non-Jews? Is it just to generalize all Jews as enemies of Islam?
The Quran in Chapter of the Cave (Arabic 'Surah Al-Kahf') made mention of the ferocious tribes called Gog and Magog who were locked up behind thick wall made of copper, built by a just Emperor named by God Himself as 'The Two-Horned One', and that one day the wall shall collapse clearing the way for Gog and Magog to terrorize the lands.
Why did the Prophet Muhammad advise the Muslims to read the last 10 verses of Chapter of the Cave, as protection from the Antichrist (Islamic 'Al-Masih Ad-Dajjal')? What possible relationship exists between the Antichrist (whom the Prophet mentioned would be a Jew) and Gog and Magog? In order to answer that, we may have to research further on the World Jewry today.
Jews today constitute two main ethnic groups, first are called the Sephardim, those who came from the Middle East and had been Jews since the time of Moses and the prophets. They are considered the original Biblical Jews, descendants of the Hebrews and also of those Jews in Arabia who had direct encounters with the Prophet Muhammad. Most can speak Arabic with fluency and are well versed with Arab culture, they generally live in peace with their Arab neighbours.
And the second group are called the Ashkenazim, they reside mainly in Eastern Europe as well as various parts of North America and many can now be found in Israel; the Ashkenazic Jews speak Yiddish as their mother tongue.
It is interesting to note that Ashkenazim, being majority of today's Jews, were the main force behind the Zionist movement. Theodor Herl, the Zionist visionary is an Ashkenazic Jew. Those terrorists responsible for the Deir Yassin massacre were all Ashkenazic Jews too.
According to Arthur Koestler, the author of The Thirteenth Tribe, Ashkenazic Jews descended originally from Turkish tribes collectively called The Khazars. Around 740 A.D., their King embraced Judaism as a well planned strategy to maintain Khazaria as a buffer state between the Islamic Abbasid Caliphate and the Christian Byzantium. The conversion was not religious in motive at all.
Over time the Khazar converted Jews began to really consider themselves as biological descendants of Abraham, although in fact they are descendants of Togarmah, descendant of Japheth, Father of the Turks. Abraham was a Semite and direct offspring of Sam, son of Noah. Eventually the Khazars began to establish their Judaic Khazar Empire around the Black Sea.
They were so powerful that even the fierce Vikings around them feared their military might. The vast Jewish empire was destroyed a few centuries later due to military alliance between the Byzantium and the Vikings, and since then the Khazars moved westward towards Europe, and were subsequently known as the Ashkenazim.
Are Ashkenazic Jews of today descendants of the ancient Gog and Magog? Is God through Chapter of the Cave informing Humanity about the coming Zionist Movement, by mentioning the barbarity of Gog and Magog? Is the term 'Anti-semitism' a misnomer? Shall it be replaced with 'Anti-Khazarism'? Are not the Arabs purer semites compared to majority of Jews who are Turkish in origin? These are the questions that need serious research and pondering by us all.

Links:
Gog and Magog and the Kingdom of the Khazars
Benjamin Freedman Speaks
Are Today's Jews True Israelites?
The Dark Side of the Israeli Connection
B'nai B'rith and ADL hypocritical, says critics
Early Russian History
Scythia
The Crusades from the perspective of Byzantium and the Islamic World

Profile of the 'Christian Evangelist terrorist' George W. Bush

We have compiled here resources on the terrorist activities of Bush, from the US Intelligence planned attack on The Twin Towers on September 11, to slaughtering of millions of innocent civilians in Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq and recently Lebanon.
For the attention of readers, George W. Bush is a 'born again Christian', the term well known to fundamentalist Masonic Christians, denoting the initiation of new members into their (Masonic) form of Christianity.
The Evangelical Christian Movement of Bush can be traced back to The Crusades and The Knights Templars under whose occupation of Palestine in 1066 A.D., 60,000 Palestinian civilians had been ruthlessly slaughtered. And today, their descendants while holding the highest level of American governmental positions are lauching the same Crusades, towards not just Palestine but also Afghanistan, Lebanon and Iraq.
We believe that the American occupation of the Muslim world is just continuation of centuries long Crusades between Anti-messianic Christians and the Muslims.
Truely, The White House is under occupation of Fundamentalist 'Anti-christian' Christians, working in collaboration with Israel. Both together with Iran are waiting for the same Messiah; Christ, Moshiach and The Twelth Imam may possibly be the same person.

Article:
Wikipedia complete profile

Videos:
2000 Presidential Election
How Bush stole The White House.
Why Bush invaded Iraq
The real reasons behind the occupation of Iraq.
The Apocalypse
The Evangelical Christian influence in The White House.
With God on Our Side
Bush Junior's devotion as an Evangelical Christian and how that influenced his policy towards the Islamic World.
The World according to Bush
Bush as a puppet of the elite behind the scene.

Paul Findley: The Congressman Who Challenged the Zionist Lobby

Paul Findley, a former U.S. Congressman, served in Capitol Hill for 22 years, during which he encountered the formidable influence of the pro-Israel lobby in Washington, D.C. A courageous and outspoken political figure, Findley took on one of the most sensitive issues in American politics: the outsized role of Zionist lobbying in shaping U.S. foreign policy. His experiences led him to author several best-selling books, the most notable being They Dare to Speak Out, which exposed the power of the Israeli lobby and its influence over American decision-making.

A High-Level Insider’s Revelations

Findley’s book, They Dare to Speak Out, sold millions of copies worldwide and remains one of the most important works shedding light on the influence of pro-Israel organizations on American politics. As a government insider, his revelations were particularly significant, as they came from someone who had first-hand experience dealing with the mechanics of power in Washington. The book describes how politicians, media figures, and policymakers who dared to criticize Israel or advocate for Palestinian rights faced severe political and financial consequences, often leading to the end of their careers.

In the book, Findley argues that America’s foreign policy has been deeply compromised by Zionist interests, to the detriment of both the United States and the Middle East. He details how lobbying organizations, such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), exert tremendous influence over Congress, shaping policies that align with Israeli interests rather than prioritizing America’s own national concerns.

A Nation Under Influence

Findley contended that the United States had undergone a transformation due to Zionist influence. In his view, America's sovereignty and decision-making capabilities had been eroded, making U.S. policies disproportionately aligned with Israel’s agenda. This shift, according to him, not only impacted America’s standing in the world but also led to entanglements in conflicts that served foreign interests rather than domestic ones.

The book resonates deeply with those who question the power dynamics of modern American politics, particularly conspiracy theorists who argue that the American government is not fully in control of its own policies. It presents a case that many had suspected but few were willing to articulate so boldly: that foreign influence has permeated the highest levels of U.S. governance, particularly regarding Middle Eastern affairs.

Findley’s Support for Palestinian Rights

Beyond his critique of Zionist lobbying, Paul Findley was also an ardent supporter of Palestinian rights. He condemned the occupation of Palestinian territories and advocated for a fair and just resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. His stance on this issue won him respect among leaders from both the Christian and Muslim worlds, who saw in him a rare American politician willing to stand up for Palestinian justice.

Findley argued that U.S. policies in the Middle East needed to be rebalanced to reflect fairness and justice for all parties involved, rather than being dictated by lobbying groups with an interest in maintaining Israel’s dominance. He called for greater awareness among Americans about the reality of the Palestinian struggle and encouraged fair and open discourse on the topic, despite the political risks associated with such positions.

A Hero for Those Who Fight for Freedom

For many activists and advocates of justice, Paul Findley became a symbol of political courage. He was a rare voice in Congress who dared to challenge the status quo and raise uncomfortable questions about the role of foreign influence in shaping U.S. policies. Despite facing significant opposition, he remained committed to his principles and continued his advocacy even after leaving office.

His legacy is one that extends beyond American politics. He is revered by those who fight for freedom, justice, and self-determination, particularly in the Palestinian territories. His work has inspired countless individuals who seek to challenge oppressive systems and expose hidden power structures that shape global politics.

The Impact of They Dare to Speak Out

Findley’s They Dare to Speak Out remains a crucial resource for those interested in understanding the dynamics of U.S.-Israel relations and the broader implications of foreign influence in American politics. The book has been widely read and debated, with supporters praising its courage and detractors attempting to dismiss it as controversial or conspiratorial. Regardless of where one stands on the issue, its impact on political discourse is undeniable.

The book also serves as an important reference for those examining the role of lobbying in shaping American policy, beyond just Israeli interests. It raises fundamental questions about how democracy functions when powerful interest groups can effectively silence dissenting voices and manipulate policy decisions.

Conclusion

Paul Findley’s career and writings provide a unique and invaluable perspective on American politics, foreign policy, and the role of special interest groups. His willingness to challenge the prevailing narrative and his commitment to justice earned him respect from diverse circles around the world.

His book, They Dare to Speak Out, is more than just an exposé—it is a warning and a call to action for those who value transparency, national sovereignty, and ethical policymaking. Whether one agrees with all his assertions or not, the importance of his work cannot be ignored. Paul Findley remains a hero to many who fight for justice and truth, and his contributions to political discourse will continue to be relevant for generations to come.

Video:
Paul Findley speaks
The senator speaks again of The Zionist Lobby in America.

The Prophet, Muhammad in Hindu Scriptures

God stated in the Quran, "And to every nation there was sent a messenger," a verse that underscores divine mercy towards all people across the globe. This declaration affirms that guidance has been provided to all nations throughout history, ensuring that no community was left without divine direction.

Historically, a significant number of messengers were sent to the Children of Israel. Figures such as Moses, David, Solomon, and Jesus were part of a long chain of prophets who conveyed God’s commandments to the Israelite community. However, with the advent of Prophet Muhammad, the message of monotheism transcended ethnicity and geographic boundaries, becoming a universal directive for all of humanity.

Muhammad: The Universal Messenger

The final messenger, Muhammad, was born in Arabia, but his mission was global in scope. Unlike the previous prophets who were primarily sent to specific nations, Muhammad’s teachings were meant for all people, irrespective of race or nationality. The Quran explicitly affirms this universality in several verses, including:

"We have not sent you but as a mercy to the worlds" (Quran 21:107).

His divine mission was not limited to saving one community but aimed at guiding all of mankind away from ignorance and toward eternal salvation. This universal approach marks a significant shift from the localized messages of previous prophets.

Prophecies of Muhammad in Other Scriptures

Over the centuries, scholars have extensively researched the presence of Muhammad’s prophecies in the scriptures of different religious traditions, including the Bible, Hindu texts, and Zoroastrian writings.

Prophecies in the Bible

Many Islamic scholars argue that references to the coming of Prophet Muhammad can be found in both the Old and New Testaments. One of the most cited verses is from Deuteronomy:

"I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brethren; and I will put My words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I command him" (Deuteronomy 18:18).

Muslim scholars interpret "their brethren" as a reference to the Ishmaelites, the descendants of Ishmael, who was the brother of Isaac and the forefather of the Arabs. This interpretation suggests that Muhammad was the prophet foretold to lead humanity back to monotheism.

Similarly, in the Gospel of John, Jesus speaks of a coming figure referred to as the "Paraclete" or "Comforter":

"But when the Comforter has come, whom I shall send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, he will testify of me" (John 15:26).

Islamic interpretations suggest that this “Comforter” is not the Holy Spirit but rather Prophet Muhammad, whose mission was to confirm the teachings of Jesus and guide people to the truth.

Prophecies in Hindu Scriptures

Hindu texts also contain passages that some scholars believe allude to Prophet Muhammad. In the Bhavishya Purana, there is a prophecy that describes a figure named "Mahamada," who is said to come from a land of sandy terrain and will guide his people away from idol worship. The description closely aligns with Muhammad’s mission in Arabia, where he called people away from polytheism toward the worship of one God.

Furthermore, the Rigveda speaks of a noble individual who will be characterized by his honesty and divine wisdom, matching the attributes of Prophet Muhammad. The Atharvaveda also describes a leader with a great following, coming from a desert region and establishing a righteous community.

Prophecies in Zoroastrian Scriptures

Zoroastrian texts contain references to a future prophet who will restore true monotheism. The Dasatir and Zend Avesta, key Zoroastrian scriptures, speak of a "Saoshyant" (benefactor or savior) who will emerge to bring justice and truth. Some scholars believe this description aligns with Prophet Muhammad, given that his mission reintroduced monotheism in a region where idolatry was prevalent.

Additionally, the Bundahishn, an ancient Zoroastrian text, describes a final prophet who will purify the world from falsehood and lead people back to the worship of the One True God.

Conclusion

The presence of prophetic references to Muhammad in religious scriptures beyond Islam strengthens the argument for the universality of his message. Scholars from various traditions have highlighted these prophecies, demonstrating that the advent of Muhammad was foretold across different faiths. This further supports the Quranic claim that divine guidance has always been available to humanity, culminating in the final revelation through Prophet Muhammad.

His teachings continue to guide millions worldwide, and his message of monotheism, justice, and moral rectitude remains relevant in contemporary times. The universality of his mission makes him not just a prophet for Arabs but a messenger for all of mankind, fulfilling God’s promise of guidance to every nation.

In the lecture below, an Indian sub-continent scholar of Islam, gave revealing account of the prophecies of the advent of Muhammad in the Hindu scriptures:
Prophet Muhammad in Hindu scriptures

Neturei Karta: Our brothers in Judaism

From my experience mixing with Jews in Prestwich, Manchester in particular with Rabbi David Ebbing of the Hasidic sect, not all Jews are Zionists and enemies of Islam, although majority are.
A small minority of the Jews, such as those from Neturei Karta, oppose strictly State of Israel calling it an unjust and illegitimate state, and believe that non-Jews can also be saved in the Next World provided they do not associate God with anything.
Chief Rabbi of the British Jews, Rabbi Jonathan Sacks a few years ago condemned openly Israel's violent policy towards Palestinians, arguing that State of Israel's actions do not comply with the teachings of Torah and Judaism. He was labelled 'heretic' by fellow Rabbis from other denominations.
It is essential that Muslims and Christians understand the differences between Judaism as a religion that was brought originally by revelation from God to Moses, and Zionism that is a modern political ideology that was propounded by the atheist Theodor Herzl who (based on recent evidence uncovered by researchers) was actually an anti-semite.
Sincere Muslims and Christians must make alliance with non-Zionist Jews and make this Globe a better place, for we have a common enemy standing before us. The Zionists are not enemies of the Muslims only but enemies of Mankind.
Bearing that in mind, we would like to reiterate the fact that the first martyr of Zionist oppression in Palestine was an anti-Zionist orthodox Jew, not a Palestinian. He was murdered brutally in the 1920's by the Haganah.
For further information, please visit Neturei Karta's War on Judaism. It is a lecture given by an American Rabbi touching the real nature of Zionism and how it opposes Judaism, as well as the atheistic history of the former. The Rabbi stated that the Jews have no rights to Palestine and that the Jewish Rabbi of Jerusalem (before foundation of Israel in 1948) objected to establishment of the Jewish state.

Rare Books:
On Zionist role in murder of the Jewish people in the Holocaust
Zionism and the Holocaust
The Holocaust Violence
Collaboration of Zionists with Nazis in the Holocaust.
How Zionists played their part in massacre of the Jewish people.

Rare Video:
Zionism and Herzl
Theodor Herzl based on his secret diary was an antisemite.
Herzl spoke highly of Western civilization and how he despised his own people, the Jews.
His atheism and dislike for Judaism.
How he wanted his son to convert to Christianity.

Gog & Magog and Israeli terrorism in Palestine and Lebanon

Please visit this video link to have a glimpse of years of Israeli terrorism on the people of Palestine and Lebanon.
Are all Jews today really descendants of the Biblical Israelites? If that is so, why did several scholars, (among them a Jew himself called Arthur Koestler) write in their attempt to prove that majority of Jews today are not Semites? (Please read 'The Thirteenth Tribe' by Koestler)The Thirteenth Tribe argues that around 90% of World Jewry who came originally from Eastern Europe in fact descended from a Turkic federation of tribes called The Khazars; they embraced Judaism in large numbers in 740 A.D. and over time became fervents followers of Torah and subsequently defenders of the International Jewry.
The founders of Zionism had all been non-Semitic Khazar Jews or Eastern European Jews as they later came to be known.
If majority of the Jews are not Semites, who are they then?
It's interesting to note that the Prophet Muhammad stated that Gog and Magog are Turkish tribes and very ferocious ones.
Ahmad Thomson, an authority on The End Times stated in his recent book 'The Next World Order':'This answer of King Joseph is very significant, not only because it demonstrates conclusively that the Khazar Jews are not semitic, but also because, as we shall see in greater detail later on in this book, Insyaallah, the uncle of Togarma, according to Genesis 10.2-3, was Magog.This means that it is highly likely that the prophecies in The Bible and in the Quran, together with the prophecies made by the Prophet Muhammad, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, concerning Gog and Magog, are directly relevant to the activities and destiny of the Khazar Jews.... It is therefore clear that the Khazar Jews are not descended from any of the original twelve tribes that formed the original Tribe of Israel, but rather are directly related to the people of Gog and Magog.'
Please continue with his book here.
The video by Ted Pike called 'The Other Israel' gave quite a detailed account of the conversion of Khazars to Judaism. Please watch here.
Could 'Yajuj wa Majuj' of the Quran refer to present International Zionists, whose movement had been founded by Ashkenazic Eastern European Jews of Khazar origins? Could the ancient Khazars be the ancient Gog and Magog who had direct encounters with 'Zulqarnain' of the Quran?
Today, Zionists are in control of America, the Globe's only Superpower and together with their Masonic brethren control the World ultimately.

CIA responsible for the 1993 WTC bombing working with so-called Islamic fighters

This lecture was given by J.A. Calhoun, a Research consultant.
The video you are about to see has been banned and never to be reaired or resold.
The insider research consultant revealed what really had happened behind the bombing, and who had been behind the event.
Please watch here.
The Prophet Muhammad stated in an authentic narration that the Antichrist (Islamic 'Al-Masih Ad-Dajjal') will appear among the Kharijites. At the time of the 4 Caliphs, the Kharijites were known for their extremism and very rigid application of Islamic Law as well as their rebellions towards the just rulers. The Prophet prophesied the future reemergence of Kharijites in every period of Islam until the last among them will rejoin The Antichrist.
We urge the Muslims to return to the original Islam that was brought by the Prophet himself, Islam that is pure from polytheism, religious innovations and of course extremism.
The author, Abu Hurairah Al-Malizi is currently preparing a book, touching among others the secret US-Iran military alliance and the future alliance between Israel and America with so-called Iranian Islamic fundamentalists, who are fooling the masses with their apparent hatred of the U.S. but collaborating with their 'enemy' to kill Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq.
It has always been the tradition of the Kharijites to kill Muslims while letting non-Muslims live.
The present Arab Shiites are descendants of the Prophetic Kharijites who betrayed and killed Imam Ali and Imam Hussein, but after their demise had been mourning over their martyrdom, arguably in the view of Al-Malizi to deceive the Muslims.
The West never gave enough credit to real Islamic scholars like Ibn Taimiyyah, Ibn Qayyim and their likes but instead popularised extreme and innovator ones like Khomeini.

'Real War on Terror' video compilation

This compilation reveals all the blatant lies that the Christian terrorist Bush had presented to the Globe before deciding to annihilate the entire Iraqi population.
'Al-Qaeda' without doubt is a terrorist organization, but what is Al-Qaeda in comparison to the much larger American state terrorism?
American state terrorism had inflicted wounds in Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki), Vietnam, Palestine and now Iraq. Iraq is the worst of all.
Also revealing U.S.-Shiite alliance in annihilating the Sunni Muslims, especially in Sadr City.

Introduction

The Iraq War (2003-2011) remains one of the most controversial military interventions in modern history. Initiated by the United States under the George W. Bush administration, the war was justified on the basis of eliminating Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and removing Saddam Hussein’s authoritarian regime. However, the failure to find WMDs, coupled with the long-term instability that followed, has led to widespread criticism of the war’s rationale, execution, and aftermath. This article critically examines the justifications for the invasion, the broader impact of U.S. foreign policy, and the war’s geopolitical consequences.

Justifications for the Iraq War

The Bush administration presented multiple arguments for the invasion of Iraq:

1. Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) The primary justification for the war was the claim that Iraq possessed WMDs and posed an imminent threat to global security. U.S. intelligence, alongside British intelligence, asserted that Saddam Hussein was stockpiling chemical and biological weapons. However, post-invasion inspections by the Iraq Survey Group revealed no evidence of active WMD programs, exposing a major intelligence failure.

2. Links to Terrorism The Bush administration also attempted to connect Saddam Hussein’s regime with al-Qaeda, implying that Iraq was a sponsor of global terrorism. This claim was widely disputed, with subsequent reports, including those from the 9/11 Commission, concluding that no operational link existed between Iraq and al-Qaeda. Instead, the invasion created a power vacuum that facilitated the rise of terrorist groups such as ISIS.

3. Democracy and Human Rights The war was also framed as a mission to liberate the Iraqi people from Hussein’s brutal dictatorship and to establish democracy in the region. While Saddam’s removal ended a repressive regime, the subsequent instability, sectarian violence, and rise of extremist groups undermined the very ideals the intervention claimed to promote.

4. Strategic and Economic Interests Some analysts argue that the war was driven by U.S. strategic and economic interests, particularly in securing access to Iraq’s vast oil reserves. The involvement of major American corporations in post-war reconstruction fueled speculation that economic motives played a significant role in the decision to invade.

Impact on U.S. Foreign Policy

The Iraq War significantly reshaped U.S. foreign policy in the following ways:

1. Erosion of U.S. Credibility The failure to find WMDs and the perception that intelligence was manipulated to justify the war severely damaged the credibility of the United States on the global stage. This skepticism extended to later U.S. interventions, including in Libya and Syria, where American claims were met with greater scrutiny.

2. Increased Military and Economic Costs The war cost the U.S. over $2 trillion, with long-term financial obligations, including veteran care, expected to increase that figure. The loss of nearly 4,500 American soldiers and over 100,000 Iraqi civilians also contributed to war fatigue among the American public, influencing future foreign policy decisions.

3. Shift in Middle Eastern Dynamics The war destabilized Iraq and empowered regional actors such as Iran. The removal of Saddam Hussein eliminated a key counterbalance to Iranian influence, allowing Tehran to expand its political and military reach through alliances with Iraqi Shiite militias.

4. Rise of Sectarianism and Terrorism The war exacerbated sectarian divisions, particularly between Sunni and Shiite communities. The U.S. occupation dismantled the Sunni-dominated Ba'athist government and empowered Shiite factions, leading to deep resentment among Sunni Iraqis. This environment facilitated the rise of extremist groups like ISIS, which capitalized on Sunni grievances and the post-war security vacuum.

Geopolitical Consequences

The consequences of the Iraq War extended beyond the country’s borders, influencing regional and global geopolitics.

1. Iraq’s Internal Instability The power vacuum left by Hussein’s removal resulted in prolonged political instability, weak governance, and ongoing sectarian violence. Corruption and inefficiency in the Iraqi government further hindered the country’s recovery.

2. Iran’s Expanded Influence With Saddam’s regime dismantled, Iran strengthened its foothold in Iraq through political and military support to Shiite factions. This shift altered the balance of power in the Middle East, intensifying tensions between Iran and Sunni-majority states like Saudi Arabia.

3. Creation of ISIS The war and subsequent occupation policies, including the disbanding of the Iraqi military, contributed to the rise of ISIS. Former Ba'athist officers, marginalized by the new government, joined extremist groups, leading to the emergence of one of the most dangerous terrorist organizations in modern history.

4. Strained U.S. Alliances The war divided the international community, with major allies like France and Germany opposing the invasion. The United Nations' failure to authorize the intervention further delegitimized the war and weakened global confidence in U.S. leadership.

Conclusion

The Iraq War stands as a case study in the consequences of interventionist foreign policy based on flawed intelligence and strategic miscalculations. While the removal of Saddam Hussein ended a brutal dictatorship, the war’s aftermath—sectarian violence, terrorism, regional instability, and the loss of American credibility—raises critical questions about the long-term implications of military interventions. The lessons of Iraq continue to shape global political discourse, emphasizing the need for more cautious and evidence-based decision-making in international affairs.

Please watch:
Real War on Terror Part 1
Iraq: The Reckoning
Real War on Terror Part 2
America's Secret Shame
Real War on Terror Part 3
American style of kidnap and torture

American Foreign Policy: The War against the Third World

This documentary reveals what you did not learn at school or see and hear on mainstream media.
It is about American state terrorism towards innocent civilians of Third World countries. This video shows illegal activities of The White House terrorists in submitting the whole Globe to their New World Order.
CIA in its 40 years of Global operations was responsible for the death of around 6 million innocent civilians. They are not perceived as 'terrorists' because they have power behind the American media to portray them as 'fighters of the free world'. Instead, much weaker terrorist Islamic groups are being exaggerated as threats to the free world and democracy. It is arguable that the rise of Islamic terrorists is a direct result of people like Bin Laden seeing their Muslim brethren being killed unjustly by 'real' terrorist groups like CIA, KGB and Mossad.
The U.S. media is under complete invasion of the Zionists, ever since the days of J.P. Morgan, under whose supervision, 12 most powerful media newspaper companies had been summoned to unite for the common goal of subverting free speech. J.P. Morgan is an agent of the Rothschild family.
CIA was involved in many Third World countries; political assasinations, takeovers of countries and massacre of the masses in Indonesia (helping Suharto to come into power), Iran (helping Shah Iran to throne), Vietnam, Nicaragua, Korea, Cambodia and various other Muslim countries.
The United States is in reality the Globe's greatest terrorist state! All oppressed people of the World! Let us unite in making our Globe a better place!

Please watch this amazing documentary here.

Links:
CIA
Al-Qaeda
Iran-Contra Affair

The White House under invasion of Gog and Magog?

We present here John Pilger's 'Breaking the Silence' documentary to reveal all the terrorist activities of The White House, CIA and the Pentagon ever since 1940's.
In the period spanning more than 40 years, the United States in expanding their 'Free World' and so-called democracy had interfered in the domestic politics of more than 70 Third World countries, killing more than 6 million innocent civilians in total, and the number is increasing daily in Iraq and Palestine. The worst of all these so far is Indonesia, when Suharto assisted by CIA killed more than a million innocent people under pretext of regime change.
Please watch 'Breaking the Silence' here.
The IVI Group is not of the opinion that Al-Qaeda is a creation of the United States, however we believe Bin Laden did receive some form of training from CIA, to be used against the U.S. itself later on, after the Afghan war. The U.S. does give support however to Shiite so-called 'mujahidin' fighters, and until now (in Iraq) has been supporting Muqtada As-Sadr to annihilate the Sunni population.
We do not support the terrorist activities perpetrated by Bin Laden but simultaneously we believe he is just a product of American terrorism and hatred towards American injustice.
Intensive research by The IVI Group shows that The White House began to pursue its policy of Global terror just before the beginning of World War Two, in other words soon after the Zionist lobby began to have its grip on The White House. And now, the Lobby controls virtually every level of the American Government.
For information on the Zionist lobby in The White House, please watch a documentary called 'Republican Paul Findley Dares to Speak Out' here, where Senator Findley had been interviewed on the Zionist lobby in America. Senator Findley has been struggling hard to oppose the power of the lobby, but to no avail, he is well respected by fellow senators as well as those from both Western and Islamic worlds. He is the author of the International best seller 'They dare to speak out' writing against Zionism in the American Government.
The origins of the Zionist movement can be traced back to Europe, pioneered by Eastern European Jews. Theodor Herzl is an Eastern European Jew, and so the rest of other founders of Zionism.
'The Thirteenth Tribe' by Arthur Koestler argues that around 90% of World Jewry descended from a Turkish federation of tribes called 'The Khazars'. The Khazars, he further argued are forefathers of today's Ashkenazic Jews, who are today known as 'Eastern European Jews'. They embraced Judaism in 740 A.D. and over time proved themselves to be protector of International Jewry, although their Kings at the time acknowledged the fact that they have nothing to do in genealogy to Abraham, in short they're Turks and not Semites.
The real Jews of the Bible number less than 10% and most can be found in Israel as well as in diverse Middle Eastern countries. They are less hostile to the Arabs, unlike their Ashkenazic brethren. Thus majority of today's Jews (Ashkenazic Jews) are not Semites but in fact Turks.
Visitors can read 'The Thirteenth Tribe' here.
It's interesting to note that the Bible and the Quran made mention of ferocious tribes called 'Gog Magog' (Quranic 'Yajuj wa Majuj') who will appear at the end times to spread corruption on the Globe. The Prophet Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam mentioned in an authentic narration that Gog Magog are Turkish in origins.
Thus, The White House is under tight grip of the Khazar Eastern European Jews who are all pro-Zionists. Names that we are familiar with; Henry Kissinger, Paul Wolfowitz and Madeleine Albright are all Eastern European Jews.
If research by Arthur Koestler is accurate, we can conclude beyond reasonable doubt that The White House is being invaded by non-Semitic Jews whose Khazar forefathers may be related to Biblical Gog and Magog. If the ancient Khazars (forefathers of today's Eastern European Jews according to Koestler) are indeed the Biblical Gog and Magog, we may be faced with a scary reality that Israel in particular and America are not under Jewish control, rather under Gog and Magog usurping as 'Jews'.